05.03.2011

Ukraine: Refugee is imprisoned again because he is a refugee

On 2 March 2011 in the premises of the Kyiv City Migration Service (KMS), right after receiving a rejection in refugee status from that authority, a refugee Denis Solopov was detained by police. Migration Service where refugees are supposed to come and ask for protection turned out to be a trap, where they are caught on demand of their persecutors.

Denis Solopov came to Ukraine in order to seek asylum from persecution by the authorities of the Russian Federation and, as it is required by the Law of Ukraine

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Дискуссія
3
  1. [...] Ukraine: Refugee is imprisoned again because he is a refugee Published on March 11, 2011 in Uncategorized. 0 Comments Source: No Border Project – Social Action Centre [...]

Прокоментувати

Вам треба зареєструватися або залогінитися, щоб мати змогу коментувати

Latest publications

Global Detention Project – Ukraine Detention Profile

This is the rewiew of situation with the detention of migrants in Ukraine, prepared by the inter-disciplinary research initiative "Global Detention Project".

Source: here

The UN Refugee Agency welcomes that Mr. Abdoumalik Abdoulladjanov is in good health upon his release

KYIV, Ukraine, 5 April 2013 - UNHCR welcomes that Mr. Abdoumalik Abdoulladjanov, a US recognized refugee, is in good health upon his release from detention since February 5, 2013.

The UN Refugee Agency calls on Ukrainian authorities to protect a refugee recognized in the US

The Regional Representation of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees encourages the Ukrainian authorities to extend protection to a US recognized refugee who has been detained at Boryspil airport on February 5, 2013, in response to an Interpol red flag. The person is currently being held under temporary arrest while the General Prosecutor’s Office is considering the request for his extradition.

OPINION NO. 2/2012 (XII.10) KMK. OF THE SUPREME COURT OF HUNGARY (KÚRIA) ON CERTAIN QUESTIONS RELATED TO THE APPLICATION OF THE SAFE THIRD COUNTRY CONCEPT

10 December 2012

The Supreme Court of Hungary (Kúria) issued an official opinion on 10 December 2012 in order to promote a harmonised practice at Hungarian courts regarding the application of the safe third country concept in asylum cases. The concrete reason for issuing such a guidance document was that in recent years, different Hungarian regional courts applied different approaches upon reviewing administrative decisions which deny admission to the in-merit asylum procedure based on the fact that the asylum-seeker arrived in Hungary from a safe third country. This also meant a diverging evaluation of the asylum situation in Serbia (the target country of most safe third country returns of asylum-seekers from Hungary).

UNHCR is concerned about the impact of the amendments in the legislation on persons seeking protection in Ukraine

UNHCR welcomes the fact the Ukrainian authorities are continuing their efforts to improve the quality and harmony of legislation in the area of asylum. As the Visa Liberalization Action Plan between the Ukraine and the European Union stipulates that such legislation should meet both international and European standards, UNHCR continues to support the authorities in understanding and applying these standards.  In this regard, we note that the Law on amendments to some legislative acts of Ukraine in connection with adoption of the Law of the Law of Ukraine on the Legal Status of Foreigners and Stateless Persons came into power on 15 November 2012.

Update to the alternative report submitted by the coalition of NGOs (Social Action Centre, Association of Ukrainian Human Rights Monitors on Law-enforcement, Euro-Asian Jewish Congress, the Gay Forum of Ukraine) to the second cycle of the UPR for Ukraine.

September 10, 2012

On August 31, 2012, Social Action Centre made a statement on behalf of the Coalition of NGOs at the pre-session for the UPR in Geneva (see full text of the statement here). Within 10 days that passed since the pre-session, the situation dramatically changed – Ukrainian Parliament adopted the anti-discrimination law. Now this document awaits the President to sign it before it will enter into full force.

STATEMENT ON DISCRIMINATION (UKRAINE)

The informal coalition of 4 NGOs - Social Action Centre (SAC), Association of Ukrainian Human Rights Monitors on Law-enforcement (UMDPL), Euro-Asian Jewish Congress (EAJC) and The Gay Forum of Ukraine (GFU) got together to prepare the following submission(1). All member participants have a long history of cooperation in past and are expert in the topic of the discrimination in Ukraine. Main goal of this coalition submission is to draw attention to the problem of discrimination in Ukraine. Despite many previous recommendations from treaty bodies, including recommendations received and accepted by Ukraine within first cycle of the Universal Periodic Review, no significant changes were introduced into legal system in Ukraine to effectively ban discrimination and provide protection to victims of discriminatory acts and practices.

Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast)

Official Journal L 204 , 26/07/2006 P. 0023 - 0036

Source: link

Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services

Official Journal L 373 , 21/12/2004 P. 0037 - 0043

Source: link

Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation

Official Journal L 303 , 02/12/2000 P. 0016 - 0022

Source: link

The web-site is created with the support of Open Society Institute
Creative Commons License Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.